The question of whether people who publish data or sensitive information should be punished is a complex question and depends on several factors.
On one hand, the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information can have serious consequences. This could include the violation of someone's privacy and rights to privacy, potential harm to individuals, and threats to national security. In these cases, many argue that there should be penalties for those who irresponsibly disclose such information. On the other hand of the argument, there are situations where the publication of certain information serves the public's interest. For example, whistleblowers often expose corruption or wrongdoing in organizations. In these instances, some people believe that the individuals should be protected rather than punished. Ultimately, the answer often depends on the specific circumstances, including the nature of the information, the intent behind its publication, and the laws of the relevant jurisdiction. This topic continues to be debated at the highest echelons of government(s) across the globe, among legal experts, policymakers, and ethicists.
Add comment
Comments
I think the better question is, did the person publishing or whistleblower put assets lives direct at risk due to their actions?
randomly stumbled across this free blog, and they write about controversial subjects - yet has no other online presence via social media handles? But I also found this after some more digging https://muckrack.com/renzo-zindee